<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second site up!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devenia.com/2008/05/10/second-site-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devenia.com/2008/05/10/second-site-up/</link>
	<description>Internet Search Engine Marketing &#38; Optimization Services</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bjorn A. Solstad</title>
		<link>http://www.devenia.com/2008/05/10/second-site-up/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorn A. Solstad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devenia.com/?p=12#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Agreed about Joomla gaining traction. As soon as I have some more time I will move our three WP-based sites back to Joomla - because I really miss the module positions and the flexibility of Joomla. WP is still to much of a blogging tool for a corporate site like devenia.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed about Joomla gaining traction. As soon as I have some more time I will move our three WP-based sites back to Joomla - because I really miss the module positions and the flexibility of Joomla. WP is still to much of a blogging tool for a corporate site like devenia.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torkil</title>
		<link>http://www.devenia.com/2008/05/10/second-site-up/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>torkil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devenia.com/?p=12#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I think traditionally that WP has had a better codebase for SEO purposes. WP has always been about blogging as far as I know, and the permalink-term is tightly related to blogging, so URL-wise WP has always been ahead. I think however that Joomla is gaining traction in that departent nowadays. 1.6 is on the horizon, and the discussions on the dev lists look really promising.

Kudos to WP and their 2.7 too, which is looking really sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think traditionally that WP has had a better codebase for SEO purposes. WP has always been about blogging as far as I know, and the permalink-term is tightly related to blogging, so URL-wise WP has always been ahead. I think however that Joomla is gaining traction in that departent nowadays. 1.6 is on the horizon, and the discussions on the dev lists look really promising.</p>
<p>Kudos to WP and their 2.7 too, which is looking really sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
